Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supersonic Flight results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 4,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,512 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (14,575 of 15,949 topics). This Supersonic Flight is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Supersonic Flight
Topic details
Total words: 9,512
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751008.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos