Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Superhero Genre results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 938 hits . Analysis detected 5,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (6,126 of 16,562 topics). This Superhero Genre is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Superhero Genre
Topic details
Total words: 4,140
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.0% 17.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst