Topic summary
⁠19%2 analyzed articles/videos2,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Super Pacs results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,539 hits. Analysis detected 7,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,676 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,232 of 15,755 topics). This Super Pacs is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Super Pacs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,676
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos