Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sunscreen results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 928 hits. Analysis detected 6,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sunscreen is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sunscreen
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos