Topic summary
23%5 analyzed articles/videos2,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Summer Activities results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 2,338 hits. Analysis detected 12,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,756 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,359 of 15,785 topics). This Summer Activities is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Summer Activities
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles21.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate