Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sudan War results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hindsight Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 147 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sudan War is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sudan War
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos