Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Subway Shooting results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,003 hits. Analysis detected 5,898 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,532 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,406 of 16,562 topics). This Subway Shooting is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Subway Shooting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,532
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos