Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Subway Operations results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 3,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,065 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,148 of 16,494 topics). This Subway Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Subway Operations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,065
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.0% percentile
10.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 27.9%27.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 25.2%25.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 25.4%25.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 15.6%15.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 15.8%15.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.3%27.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 36.9%36.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.5%20.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 36.9%, sitewide 26.9%Bandwagon: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos