Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Substance Regulation results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 967 hits. Analysis detected 6,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Substance Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Substance Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 3,252
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.7%29.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 20.7%20.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.5%24.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos