Topic summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos3,648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Substance Abuse Treatment results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,250 hits. Analysis detected 9,591 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,944 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,440 of 16,486 topics). This Substance Abuse Treatment is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Substance Abuse Treatment
Topic details
Total words: 10,944
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos