Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Subpoena results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 3,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Subpoena is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Subpoena
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,144
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 14.1%14.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.5%20.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos