Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Style results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 1,533 hits. Analysis detected 9,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,872 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,226 of 16,562 topics). This Style is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Style
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,872
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.5%19.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.0%14.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos