Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,844 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Students results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 594 hits. Analysis detected 5,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,532 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,843 of 16,562 topics). This Students is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Students
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,532
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos