Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Student Experiences results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Straw Man, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 753 hits. Analysis detected 2,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,227 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Student Experiences is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Student Experiences
Topic details
Total words: 4,227
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.8%17.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos