Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Student Cellphone Use results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 1,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Student Cellphone Use is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Student Cellphone Use
Topic details
Total words: 3,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos