Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video501 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Athletes results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 648 hits. Analysis detected 3,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,397 of 16,562 topics). This Student Athletes is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Student Athletes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,004
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.5% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.0%16.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.1%12.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.3%32.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 5.0%5.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Special Pleading: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos