Topic summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Athlete Balance results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 976 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (7,208 of 22,816 topics). This Student Athlete Balance is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Student Athlete Balance
Topic details
Total words: 1,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos