Topic summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Achievements results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 980 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (16,645 of 23,769 topics). This Student Achievements is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Student Achievements
Topic details
Total words: 2,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos