Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,376 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stress results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,172 hits. Analysis detected 6,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,547 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (14,577 of 16,562 topics). This Stress is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Stress
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,547
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510012.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.1%8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos