Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Street Naming results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 606 hits. Analysis detected 4,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,536 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,384 of 16,562 topics). This Street Naming is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Street Naming
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,536
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos