Topic summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video1,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Streaming Trends results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 1,317 hits. Analysis detected 5,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,286 of 16,562 topics). This Streaming Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Streaming Trends
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.1% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.0%32.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos