Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Streaming Television results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 2,010 hits. Analysis detected 8,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,488 of 16,562 topics). This Streaming Television is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Streaming Television
Topic details
Total words: 5,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 37.4%37.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.6%14.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 37.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos