Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos843 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strawberry Moon results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 676 hits. Analysis detected 3,097 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,360 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,147 of 16,562 topics). This Strawberry Moon is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Strawberry Moon
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,360
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos