Topic summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos3,343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strategic Planning results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,112 hits. Analysis detected 9,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,486 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,138 of 16,562 topics). This Strategic Planning is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Strategic Planning
Topic details
Total words: 10,486
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos