Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strait Of Hormuz Dispute results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 772 hits. Analysis detected 4,006 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,338 of 16,562 topics). This Strait Of Hormuz Dispute is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Strait Of Hormuz Dispute
Topic details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 24.5%24.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.1%9.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos