Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stomach results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 3,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,582 of 16,559 topics). This Stomach is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Stomach
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,392
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos