Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Miller results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 473 hits . Analysis detected 4,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,347 of 16,562 topics). This Stephen Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group. Stephen Miller
Topic details
Total words: 3,000
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.7% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst