Topic summary
⁠43%4 analyzed articles/videos2,566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stem Education results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,080 hits. Analysis detected 8,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,514 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,379 of 15,941 topics). This Stem Education is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Stem Education
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,514
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos