Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Status results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 275 hits. Analysis detected 2,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,740 of 16,562 topics). This Status is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Status
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,428
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos