Topic summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video1,615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Sponsored Terrorism results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 1,184 hits. Analysis detected 8,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,353 of 21,282 topics). This State Sponsored Terrorism is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
State Sponsored Terrorism
Topic details
Total words: 6,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.3%18.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos