Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These State Parks results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 310 hits. Analysis detected 1,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This State Parks is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
State Parks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos