Topic summary
75%4 analyzed articles/videos1,479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Fair results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 1,385 hits. Analysis detected 7,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,552 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,770 of 16,562 topics). This State Fair is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
State Fair
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,552
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.5%24.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.9%24.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate