Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Budgeting results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 503 hits. Analysis detected 3,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,835 of 16,562 topics). This State Budgeting is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
State Budgeting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,128
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos