Topic summary
94%1 analyzed article/video515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Startup Events results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 50.2% saturation with 775 hits. Analysis detected 2,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,545 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,834 of 16,562 topics). This Startup Events is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Startup Events
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,545
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 50.2%50.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.3%18.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.6%16.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 50.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos