Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Star Bonds results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 1,877 hits. Analysis detected 10,006 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,374 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,476 of 16,562 topics). This Star Bonds is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Star Bonds
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,374
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.1%18.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos