Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanley Cup Playoffs results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 5,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,434 of 16,339 topics). This Stanley Cup Playoffs is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Stanley Cup Playoffs
Topic details
Total words: 5,616
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos