Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Standard Of Living results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 5,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,334 of 16,562 topics). This Standard Of Living is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Standard Of Living
Topic details
Total words: 6,824
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos