Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,062 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Staffing Issues results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 4,557 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,186 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,522 of 16,562 topics). This Staffing Issues is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Staffing Issues
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,186
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.7%8.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos