Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Staffing Cuts results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 285 hits. Analysis detected 1,880 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,250 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,802 of 15,508 topics). This Staffing Cuts is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Staffing Cuts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,250
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos