Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stadium Funding results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 2,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,772 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,114 of 16,243 topics). This Stadium Funding is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Stadium Funding
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos