Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video444 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Redevelopment results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 769 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,496 of 16,562 topics). This St Louis Redevelopment is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
St Louis Redevelopment
Topic details
Total words: 1,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos