Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video5,701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Government results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 3,086 hits. Analysis detected 15,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,103 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,949 of 16,562 topics). This St Louis Government is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
St Louis Government
Topic details
Total words: 17,103
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos