Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Food Scene results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 672 hits. Analysis detected 2,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,071 of 16,562 topics). This St Louis Food Scene is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
St Louis Food Scene
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠52%St Louis Food Scene (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,056
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 22.0%22.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos