Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spring Games results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 1,298 hits. Analysis detected 6,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,303 of 15,522 topics). This Spring Games is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Spring Games
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 37.8%37.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 20.8%20.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.6%21.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.6%11.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 37.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos