Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sports Viewing results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 526 hits . Analysis detected 1,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,414 topics). This Sports Viewing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sports Viewing
Topic details
Total words: 2,508
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 21.0% 21.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst