Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sports Scandals results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 1,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,326 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sports Scandals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sports Scandals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,326
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.8%15.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos