Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Journalism results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 1,722 hits . Analysis detected 7,677 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,471 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 56% (7,314 of 16,558 topics). This Sports Journalism is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Sports Journalism
Topic details
Total words: 5,471
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 31.5% 31.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst