Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos934 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Injuries results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Hindsight Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 4,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,770 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,547 of 15,772 topics). This Sports Injuries is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Sports Injuries
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,770
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.7%7.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.9%6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos