Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Gambling results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 523 hits. Analysis detected 4,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,118 of 16,562 topics). This Sports Gambling is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Sports Gambling
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,196
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos