Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Analysis results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Bandwagon , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 416 hits . Analysis detected 985 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,326 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,556 of 16,562 topics). This Sports Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Sports Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 1,326
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 31.4% 31.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst